Before & After Gallery

27 year old woman presents for breast augmentation. Her goals are a natural appearance with improved fullness. Breast augmentation with a periareolar lift using 215cc Moderate Classic silicone gel implants under the muscle.

41 year old female with a history of a breast reduction in her teens. After several pregnancies, she desired a “natural” appearing breast augmentation. Differential implants – 500cc high profile silicone gel on the right and 450cc high profile silicone gel on the left. Both implants under the muscle to

33 year old mother of two who desired to have her breasts fuller as they were during pregnancy. Her preoperative bra size was a 34B and she wished to be a full 34C or small D. She underwent a breast augmentation with 425cc smooth, round silicone gel high profile implants

27 year old mother who experienced deflation of her breasts following breast feeding. Her goals were to fill out the breasts and particularly in the upper portions of the breasts. Preoperatively she wore a 34A cup bra and her goal was to wear a 34C. She underwent a breast augmentation

30 year old woman who had lost over 150lbs through diet and exercise. As a consequence of the large weight loss, she had significant deflation of her breasts. The goals were to fill out this skin with an implant to restore the size and shape of her breasts. She underwent

31 year old woman with small 32A cup breasts presented to my office for a breast augmentation. She was interested in round, fuller breasts in the full B to small C cup range. She underwent a breast augmentation using Mentor smooth, round, high profile 275cc silicone gel implants. The implants

34 year old who consulted with me for a breast augmentation. Her goals were a natural appearing breast augmentation without too much upper pole fullness. She chose anatomic “gummy bear” implants for her augmentation. Natrelle 410 Highly Cohesive silicone gel implants were used – 400cc MM – placed under the

25 year old woman with very small breasts presented to our office for a “natural” breast augmentation. We reviewed options for augmentation and she was happiest with the anatomic “gummy bear” implants. These implants give a tear-drop shape to the breast and have a more natural overall appearance. Her implants

23 year old female presented to my office with a desire to have larger, fuller breasts. She had a degree of constricted breast deformity which is apparent on her preoperative photos. Her goals were to be in the D cup range with very full upper breasts. A breast augmentation with