Before & After Gallery

31 year old woman with BRCA 1+. To reduce her lifetime risk of breast cancer, she was choosing to have bilateral areolar sparing mastectomies (remove the nipples, but leave the areolas). We discussed reconstruction options and she chose direct to implant reconstructions with submuscular silicone gel implants. 405cc MPX silicone

50 year old patient with left breast cancer. She would require a left mastectomy and post mastectomy radiation therapy. Reconstruction planning was for a two-stage reconstruction on the left with an expander followed by an implant. For the right breast, a reduction at the time of final implant placement for

72 year old patient with bilateral breast cancer. Her cancer surgery required a right mastectomy and left lumpectomy. Preoperative photos show a large bruise from her biopsy on the right side. She was going to need post mastectomy radiation therapy to the right breast. A challenging reconstruction to achieve symmetry.

38 year old patient with right sided breast cancer. Her goals from reconstruction were to maintain the same breast size but improve the shape with more fullness in the upper breasts. Plan for reconstruction consisted of a direct to implant (at the same surgery as mastectomy) reconstruction with silicone gel

53 year old patient with invasive breast cancer on the left side. She would require a left mastectomy (areolar sparing), chemotherapy, and post mastectomy radiation. Her reconstruction was performed in two-stages with an expander followed by an implant. She responded extremely well to the radiation with minimal tightness or distortion

51 year old female with right breast cancer who was choosing to have a bilateral nipple sparing mastectomy. Reconstruction consisted of prepectoral (on top of the muscle) implants in a single stage at the time of the mastectomies. Her implants are 700cc MHX silicone gel implants. The final results show

40 year old patient with genetic predisposition for breast cancer. Opting for bilateral prophylactic nipple sparing mastectomies. Patient chose prepectoral (on top of the muscle) reconstruction. Performed in one stage with 325cc MPX silicone gel implants. She did very well from the procedure with mild rippling present in the upper

38 yo female with a right breast cancer. She underwent bilateral nipple sparing mastectomies through incisions in the breast crease. A direct to implant reconstruction under the muscles with 350cc HP Mentor silicone gel implants and dermal matrix support. The implants provide a natural appearance and the final results do

71 yo female with a left breast cancer. She required a left mastectomy and wanted to avoid any surgery on the right side if possible. Her reconstruction consisted of a submuscular 450cc MP+ Mentor silicone gel implant with dermal matrix support. The result matches her preoperative appearance and surgery on

50 yo female with a diagnosis of left breast cancer. She underwent bilateral nipple sparing mastectomies with direct to implant reconstruction under the muscles with dermal matrix support. Her implants are 350cc HP Mentor silicone gel implants. The combination of nipple sparing mastectomies and the hidden scars in the breast