Before & After Gallery

31 yo female presented for breast augmentation to achieve fullness in the upper breast and a rounded side breast. The goal was to achieve a “push up bra” appearance without the bra. She has a mild asymmetry inherent between the two breasts with the left breast a bit wider and

37 yo female presented for a breast augmentation. After having children and breastfeeding, the volume in her breasts had deflated. Goals were to reestablish fullness in the upper breasts and avoid a lift. A submuscular breast augmentation with 310cc MHX Mentor silicone gel implants provide excellent fullness without appearing “fake”

71 yo female with a left breast cancer. She required a left mastectomy and wanted to avoid any surgery on the right side if possible. Her reconstruction consisted of a submuscular 450cc MP+ Mentor silicone gel implant with dermal matrix support. The result matches her preoperative appearance and surgery on

50 yo female with a diagnosis of left breast cancer. She underwent bilateral nipple sparing mastectomies with direct to implant reconstruction under the muscles with dermal matrix support. Her implants are 350cc HP Mentor silicone gel implants. The combination of nipple sparing mastectomies and the hidden scars in the breast

51 yo female with a previous submuscular breast augmentation 15 years prior. She had MRI confirmation of a right implant rupture, bilateral breast ptosis (sagginess), and asymmetry. Her goals were to replace the implants for something rounder and fuller, lift both breasts, and improve the symmetry. The previous implants and

51 yo female with a previous submuscular breast augmentation 15 years prior. She had MRI confirmation of a right implant rupture, bilateral breast ptosis (sagginess), and asymmetry. Her goals were to replace the implants for something rounder and fuller, lift both breasts, and improve the symmetry. The previous implants and

This younger patient is a dancer and found that performing was difficult due to the large size and position of her breasts. She wore a 34DD or E cup bra. Her goal was a reduction and lift to be able to wear comfortable C cup bras. Bilateral breast reduction was

34 yo female presented with A cup breast and wanted a full C with lots of fullness up top. She had breast asymmetry with her right breast being larger than the left. In addition, both breasts had constricted lower breast poles requiring surgical releases to allow the implants to sit

68 yo female with previous breast augmentation and revision. She developed a disfiguring capsular contracture of the left breast implant and a minor contracture of the right implant. Neither implant was ruptured. Breast augmentation revision performed by removing all the capsule scar tissue and reaugmentating with 240cc MPX implants. Significantly

57 yo female with an enlarging left breast mass requiring a large lumpectomy. She required oncoplastic reconstruction (rotation of breast tissue to fill the defect from the tumor removal) on the left side. This is performed in such a way as to resemble a breast reduction at the end of